Keine Sorge .... mußt Du nicht.
[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]
[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer] [Links nur für registrierte Nutzer] countries, invariably criticize Israel for its treatment of Palestinians. Many[2] have qualified this degree of criticism as excessive. In particular, the UNHRC was widely criticized in 2007 for failing to condemn other human rights abusers besides Israel.[3]
OIC ist [Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]
Und dazu gehören eben auch einige sehr reiche Länder, die regelmäßig zusätzlich Stimmen von Entwicklungsländern einkaufen oder Länder erpressen.It groups 57 member states, from the Middle East, Africa, Central Asia, Caucasus, Balkans, Southeast Asia and South Asia. These States decided to pool their resources together, combine their efforts and speak with one voice to safeguard the interest and ensure the progress and well-being of their peoples and those of other Muslims in the world over.
Und da passiert dann regelmäßig dieses:Und das hat auch einen klaren Grund:Human Rights Watch says that OIC has “fought doggedly” and successfully within the United Nations Human Rights Council to shield states from criticism, except when it comes to criticism of Israel. For example, when independent experts reported violations of Human Rights in the 2006 Lebanon War, “state after state from the OIC took the floor to denounce the experts for daring to look beyond Israeli violations to discuss Hezbollah’s as well”. OIC demands that the council “should work cooperatively with abusive governments rather than condemn them”. HRW responds that this works only with those who are willing to coöperate; others exploit the passivity.[15][16][Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]The OIC attracted attention at the opening session of the meeting in Putrajaya, Malaysia, on 16 October 2003, where Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad of Malaysia in his speech argued that the Jews control the world: "They invented socialism, communism, human rights and democracy, so that persecuting them would appear to be wrong, so that they can enjoy equal rights with others. With these they have gained control of the most powerful countries and they, this tiny community, have become a world power”. He also said that “The Europeans killed six million Jews out of 12 million, but today the Jews rule the world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for them”.[17][18]
The speech was very well received by the delegates, including many high ranking politicians, who responded with standing ovations"
Noch irgendwelche Fragen?
Ach ja... der Hauptteil aller Resolutionen überhaupt der UN richtet sich zum allergrößten Teil gegen Israel - als ob es gar keine anderen probleme auf dieser Welt gäbe:
Du mußt Dir also überhaupt keine Sorgen um den Wahrheitswert meiner Behauptungen machen.The world organization has 192 member nations, but the Security Council of that august body has devoted about a third of its activity and criticism to only one of those states—Israel. Similarly, about a third of all the resolutions adopted by the UN Commission on Human Rights have criticized Israel, which is the only country regularly dealt with at meetings as a separate and exclusive agenda item. In 2001 alone, the commission issued six condemnations of Israel, only to surpass this figure the following year when it passed eight anti-Israel condemnations. In contrast, no other state has ever received more than one condemnation in the same year from this body, and over three-quarters of UN members have never had a resolution passed condemning them, including such paragons of human rights as Saudi Arabia, China, Zimbabwe, and Syria, who under President Hafez Assad, lest we forget, razed the city of Hama in February 1982, killing between 20,000 and 30,000 civilians in the course of one hellish week.
The UN rarely calls for emergency special sessions and did not see any reason to hold such a meeting to discuss genocide in Rwanda, ethnic cleansing in Yugoslavia, genocide in Darfur or the horrific massacres in East Timor. But in 2003 alone, it felt the need to call an unprecedented three emergency sessions—two to condemn Israel's security barrier and one to criticize Israel for considering (considering, not even carrying out!!) the expulsion of Arafat. And yet Israel's use of military force combined over the sixty-four years of its existence has caused far fewer casualties and damage than each of these horrific events, not to mention those in Afghanistan, Algeria, Angola, Bangladesh, Bosnia, Burundi, Cambodia, Chad, Chechnya, Colombia, Congo, El Salvador, Eritrea, and Ethiopia (and that is only the first five letters of the alphabet; if we go to countries beginning with 'I' there is India; Indonesia; Iran; Iraq).
Nowhere has this hypocrisy been more starkly demonstrated than in the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, held in September 2001 in the South African town of Durban. For eight full days, delegates from numerous countries and thousands of NGOs indulged in a xenophobic orgy of anti-Israel and anti-Semitic incitement that made mockery of the conference's original purpose. Posters equating Zionism with Nazism were widely distributed while tens of thousands of hate-spouting demonstrators marched in the streets carrying banners proclaiming inter alia that "Hitler should have finished the job." Representatives of Jewish groups were subjected to taunts, physical intimidation, and organized jeering while the hate literature distributed during the conference included The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a virulent anti-Semitic tract fabricated by the Russian secret police at the turn of the 20th century and alleging an organized Jewish conspiracy to achieve world domination, as well as caricatures of Jews with hooked noses, Palestinian blood on their hands, surrounded by money, and Israelis wearing Nazi emblems. Pamphlets reading "Nazi-Israeli apartheid" were distributed daily at conference halls alongside flyers that asked (approvingly) "what if Hitler had won?" while representatives of such repressive states as Syria and Iran objected to the inclusion of anti-Semitism or the Holocaust on the grounds that anti-Semitism was a "complicated," "curious," and "bizarre" concept, and reference to the Holocaust would be imbalanced or "favoritism." Little wonder that resolutions charging Israel with "genocide and ethnic cleansing" and effectively calling for its dismantling were voted upon by regional caucuses and adopted by the NGOs' forum at the conference.
Gott mit uns
Nicht wer zuerst die Waffen ergreift, ist Anstifter des Unheils, sondern wer dazu nötigt. Niccolò Machiavelli
Nö stimmt nicht.
Eine entsprechende aussage oder Forderung kannst du von mir auch nie zitieren oder zeigen, weil ich für Freiheit bin und von Zwängen nichts halte (außer was Gesetzlich geregelt ist und auch gereglet sein sollte wie z.b. In Deutschland, sodass keiner, einen anderen schaden zufügt)
Lg
Deutsch wird groß geschrieben
Ausschwitz: Hier darf nichts über seine Gedenktafeln stehen
USrael: Der Schwanz Israel wedelt mit dem Hund USA
Quadrokopter in der Bibel: https://www.politikforen.net/showthread.php?186118
Deutsch wird groß geschrieben
Ausschwitz: Hier darf nichts über seine Gedenktafeln stehen
USrael: Der Schwanz Israel wedelt mit dem Hund USA
Quadrokopter in der Bibel: https://www.politikforen.net/showthread.php?186118
Was erwartest Du denn von der Quasselbude UNO?
Über die hälfte der Mitgliedsländer sind Diktaturen, die meisten Mitglieder sind Entwicklungsländer.
Da stimmen bankrotte Diktaturen wie Nordkorea und Simbabwe mit ab.
Ein Ländchen wie Luxemburg mit einigen hunderttausend Einwohnern hat eine Stimme, die VR China mit 1,3 Mrd. hat eine Stimme.
So gesehen fragt man sich doch was das soll und ob es nicht besser wäre die UNO zu reformieren oder besser aufzulösen.
Steh früh auf, steh fest auf, machs Maul auf
( Martin Luther )
***
Um aufs neue wach werden zu können, musst Du ohne Frage vorher einmal eingeschlafen sein, und analog dazu, um geboren werden zu können, musst Du vorher schon einmal gestorben sein (Kabalah)
Keine will den Iran Nuken!Niemand!Man will nur den Islamisten die Fähigkeit zu Entwicklung eine Atombombe nehmen!Niemand kann Interesse daran haben,das die Mullahs an eine Atombombe herum basteln!
***
Um aufs neue wach werden zu können, musst Du ohne Frage vorher einmal eingeschlafen sein, und analog dazu, um geboren werden zu können, musst Du vorher schon einmal gestorben sein (Kabalah)
Die UNO versagt ja auch jetzt bei der Ukrainekrise und scheint auch zu einem Instrument der US-Administration geworden zu sein ? Ansonsten ist die UNO bei ihrer unobjektiven und ueberzogenen Kritik an Israel zunehmend antisemtisch eingestellt.
Quelle UN Watch:
[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]
“The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.” –Prof. Caroll Quigley, Georgetown University, Tragedy and Hope (1966)
Aktive Benutzer in diesem Thema: 1 (Registrierte Benutzer: 0, Gäste: 1)
Du hast keine Berechtigung, um die Liste der Namen zu sehen.