Human Engineering and Climate Change
Forthcoming as a Target Article in Ethics, Policy and the Environment
© S. MATTHEW LIAO (NEW YORK UNIVERSITY), ANDERS SANDBERG (OXFORD), and REBECCA ROACHE (OXFORD)
Abstract
Anthropogenic climate change is arguably one of the biggest problems that confront us today.
There is ample evidence that climate change is likely to affect adversely many aspects of life for all people around the world,
and that existing solutions such as geoengineering might be too risky
and ordinary behavioural and market solutions might not be sufficient to mitigate climate change.
In this paper, we consider a new kind of solution to climate change, what we call
human engineering,
which involves biomedical modifications of humans so that they can mitigate and/or adapt to climate change.
We argue that human engineering is potentially less risky than geoengineering
and that it could help behavioural and market solutions succeed in mitigating climate change.
We also consider some possible ethical concerns regarding human engineering such as its safety,
the implications of human engineering for our children and for the society, and we argue that these concerns can be addressed.
Our upshot is that human engineering deserves further consideration in the debate about climate change.