Spontan fällt mir Sebastian Edati ein. Er ging Jahrelang seiner Abgeordnetentätigkeit nach. Keiner interessierte sich für ihn. Bis er Mitglied des NSU Untersuchungsausschusses wurde und unangenehme Fragen stellte. Die weitere Geschichte ist bekannt. Oder ganz aktuell, der amerikanische Präsidentschaftskandidat. Gespeicherte Aufnahmen werden gezielt gegen ihn eingesetzt.
Für derlei Dinge, auch viel banalere, benötigen die Dienste ALLE Daten. Speicherplatz ist kein Thema mehr. Im Bedarfsfall muss man JEDEN Gegner fertig machen können. Auch den von dem man noch gar nicht weiß das es ihn gibt.
Demokratie ist Freiheit, Rechtsstaat ist Diktatur des Geldes.
Keine Links in Signaturen
Kann mir gut vorstellen, dass es nen minimalen statistischen Zusammenhang gibt, weil in der Masse der Kleinen nen paar wenige zurückbleiben, bei denen das an Unterernährung und Mangel liegt. Ansonsten hat Körpergröße wohl kaum was mit Intelligenz zu tun und rechnet man o.g. Gruppe der mangel-/unterernährten raus, gehe ich mal stark davon aus, dass sich kein Zusammenhang ergibt. Ist theoretisch sogar denkbar, dass wegen höherem Erfolgsdruck dann vielleicht sogar minimal eher der umgekehrte Trend einsetzt, aber ohne Daten ist das jetzt mal so alles in Blaue hinein geraten.
Der Zusammenhang ist ethnisch bedingt. Südeuropäer haben einen niedrigeren IQ und sind im Durchschnitt auch kleiner als Nordeuropäer.
Schon die These, dass Frauen in der BRD statistisch 1,71 cm groß sind, ist der reinste Hohn.
Die Zigeunerweiber und Südosteuropäer, die ich hier täglich sehe, sind max. 160 cm.
---
"Groß ist die Wahrheit, und sie behält den Sieg" (3. Esra)
It's a tall man's world.When it comes to money and good health, it's a tall man’s world
Rubio is five feet 10 inches, the American average height for men. His main opponent at the time, Donald Trump, is six feet three inches. Rubio was definitely beaten on the height challenge. The open secret is that in the last 100 years, America has not had a president who is below the average height. The electorate seems to prefer taller men.
The height advantage is, however, not limited to politics. A research done on Fortune 500 executives revealed that over half of the CEOs were six feet and above and a whopping 90 per cent were above the average height.
Prof Angus Deaton, a US-based economist, conducted a research which indicated that taller men were better educated, had higher incomes, were happier and less prone to stress. His study also revealed that just an extra inch in height increased one’s incomes by 3.8 per cent among women and 4.4 per cent among men.
Yet another research by scholars at the Australian National University suggests that if the average man of about five feet 10 inches gains an additional two inches, and clocks an extra year at work, he would be able to earn an extra $950 per year.
THE CAUSE
What brings about this disparity?
The general perception has always been that taller people are preferred because they stand out and are considered better-looking. Society, clearly, prefers the tall. Science has done little to change this perception. According to the report by the Australian National University, taller people are perceived to be more intelligent and powerful. This gives them undue advantage in determining leadership among candidates.
Timothy Judge, a management professor at the University of Florida, who also conducted studies on the height advantage, concludes that being tall may boost self-confidence, helping to make a person more successful. It also prompts people to ascribe more status and respect to the tall person. This is perhaps why taller people are known to take more risks. Tellingly, most entrepreneurs are above the average height.
Judge further adds that taller people have better social skills because while younger, they were encouraged to join games and activities that helped them build these skills early. Further, given that they stand out from an early age, they tend to be selected for leadership positions, allowing them to develop leadership skills earlier on in life.
Perhaps the biggest discovery yet was by Christina Paxson, a Princeton economist, who found that nutrition is a major deciding factor when it comes to height. Children who are well-fed tend to grow to their full potential physically and mentally. This in turn translates to better mental and physical development.
PHYSICAL MANIFESTATION
This finding means that tall people are not intelligent because they are tall, but rather they are as intelligent as they are tall. Height is just a physical manifestation of a complete development process occasioned by good nutrition. Therefore, when decision-makers give opportunities to tall people, they are not being biased, they are genuinely convinced of the candidates’ capabilities.
While the height advantage cuts across gender, it is sadly not as glaring among women. The benefits tall women enjoy are minimal compared to what men accrue by being tall.
Of course, many research findings are usually based on the law of average. Many short people are successful and not all tall people are super earners.
I am 6’3 tall. I fall in the category of tall men. Have I enjoyed certain benefits and advantages? I definitely have. Perhaps the best advantage for me according to the UK research, is that I am less prone to get a heart attack.
[...]
[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]
Olympische Disziplin sollte es endlich werden!
Heizerist in Ben Ephraims Gemeinde.
Und für die ganzen Hasser, vergesst nicht:
Heizerist in Ben Ephraims Gemeinde.
Und Blondinen stehn drauf!
Heizerist in Ben Ephraims Gemeinde.
Quatsch. Dann müsste ja Stephen Hawking blöd sein, weil er schlechte Gene hat.
Die Erfahrung zeugt eher vom Gegenteil: es gibt viele große, blöde Muskelmänner.
Und die Kleinen setzen eher auf ihren Kopf.
In der Schule waren doch die Kleinen mit Brille immer die Schlauen. Und die Großen waren im Fußballverein.
Aktive Benutzer in diesem Thema: 1 (Registrierte Benutzer: 0, Gäste: 1)